Evaluation

Evaluations that demonstrate your achievements and lessons

Rigorous, context-driven formative and summative evaluations that show donors what your programme achieved, and help you decide what to do next.

Rigorous mixed methods

Quantitative and qualitative methods combined for credible findings.

Our own field teams

Evaluation data collected by our trained teams in four countries.

Actionable recommendations

Findings and lessons your team and donors can act on.

Trusted by development partners, UN agencies and research institutions

Busara Logo GIZ Logo UNICEF Logo PATH Logo University of Toronto APRM Logo World Bank Logo Columbia University Logo UNAIDS Logo UNFPA Logo
Our work

Recent evaluations

A selection of the evaluations and reviews we have delivered for our clients.

What we evaluate

Types of evaluation

From early formative work to final evaluations, we tailor the design to your project objectives and stage.

Impact evaluations

Establish causality through counterfactual analysis and comparison groups.

Process evaluations

Assess the efficiency and effectiveness of implementation strategies.

Baseline, midline and endline studies

Measure change over the life of your project against a clear starting point.

Formative evaluations

Early evidence to refine a programme’s design and delivery.

Summative and final evaluations

Demonstrate achievements and lessons to donors, using the OECD-DAC criteria.

Assessments and reviews

Focused reviews that give actionable insights for ongoing and future interventions.

Commissioning an evaluation?

Email us now

What every evaluation includes

One team from design to dissemination, so evidence flows straight from the field into your report.

Sectors we evaluate

Evaluation design

Evaluation questions, framework and sampling agreed in an inception report.

Tools and approvals

Data collection tools, piloting and ethical clearance.

Data collection

Surveys, interviews and focus groups by our own field teams.

Analysis

Quantitative and qualitative analysis, brought together.

Evaluation report

Clear findings, lessons and actionable recommendations.

Sharing the findings

Presentations and validation with your team and stakeholders.

Our approach

How an evaluation works

Rigorous and context-driven, with stakeholder engagement, ethical standards and cultural sensitivity throughout.

  1. Inception and design

    We agree the evaluation questions, criteria, methods and sample with you.

  2. Tools and approvals

    We develop and pilot the tools and secure ethical clearance.

  3. Data collection

    Our field teams collect quantitative and qualitative data, with quality checks throughout.

  4. Analysis and reporting

    We analyse, validate the findings with you and deliver a report with recommendations.

Methods and frameworks OECD-DAC criteria Counterfactual analysis Comparison groups Mixed methods Surveys Key informant interviews Focus group discussions Stakeholder engagement

Questions from evaluation commissioners

Which evaluation criteria do you use?

We commonly frame evaluations around the OECD-DAC criteria of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability, and adapt to your own framework and donor requirements.

Do you collect the data yourselves?

Yes. Our own trained field teams collect evaluation data in Zambia, Kenya, Rwanda and Zimbabwe, so we control quality from the field to the final report.

Can you run an impact evaluation?

Yes. We design impact evaluations that establish causality through counterfactual analysis and comparison groups, where the programme allows.

Can you respond to a tender or request for proposals?

Yes. Send us the terms of reference and the deadline, and we will confirm quickly whether we can bid, on our own or as part of a consortium.

How long does an evaluation take?

It depends on the design and scope. Tell us your timeline and we will propose a team and work plan that meets it.

Looking for Data Collection, Evaluation, or Research Services?