Evaluation Agriculture and Food Systems

Endline Evaluation of Agriculture and Natural Resource Conservation Project

The evaluation used surveys, interviews, and focus groups to assess project outcomes and sustainability. The evaluation followed OECD-DAC criteria, focusing on relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability. It provided actionable insights and recommendations to improve future project design and long-term success.

AssignmentConservation of Natural Resources and Food Security through Strengthening and Consolidation of Sustainable Agriculture in the Zambian Component of KAZA TFCA (BENGO III)

Client
WWF
Our role
Independent evaluator
Location
Zambia
Duration
5 months
5years of project activity assessed
5Village Action Groups covered
6OECD-DAC criteria applied
The challenge

What the client needed

After five years, WWF Zambia needed an independent assessment of the BENGO III project, which promoted sustainable agriculture, food security and natural resource conservation in the Sioma Ngwezi Game Management Area, part of the Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (KAZA TFCA).

WWF wanted to know how well the project had performed, whether its results would last, and what to change in future programmes.

Our solution

How M31 Research delivered

Between November 2023 and March 2024, M31 Research evaluated the project against the OECD-DAC criteria of relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability. We combined household surveys, key informant interviews and focus group discussions across five Village Action Groups, speaking to farmers, Community Resource Board representatives, government officials and project staff.

The evaluation was designed to be inclusive, with targeted representation of women, youth and people with disabilities, and informed consent and confidentiality were upheld throughout.

What we delivered

  • Evaluation design based on the OECD-DAC criteria
  • Household surveys, key informant interviews and focus group discussions
  • Fieldwork across five Village Action Groups
  • Inclusive sampling of women, youth and people with disabilities
  • Evaluation report with practical recommendations
The result

What changed for the client

The evaluation showed significant progress in sustainable agricultural practices, community resource management and household food security. It also pointed to areas that needed attention, particularly logistical planning, financial sustainability and ongoing community engagement. WWF received practical recommendations to address these challenges and strengthen the design of future interventions.

Key findings and outcomes

  • Stronger sustainable farming practices and household food security
  • Improved community management of natural resources
  • Clear recommendations on logistics, financial sustainability and community engagement

Have a project in mind?

Tell us about your study, evaluation or assignment and we will propose the right approach and team.

Looking for Data Collection, Evaluation, or Research Services?